Daniel F. Sullivan

(he/him/his)

Partner

  • Overview

    Biography

    Daniel Sullivan is a trial lawyer with over 30 years of experience representing clients in complex commercial disputes, with an emphasis on insurance coverage and extra-contractual claims litigation. He has represented clients in state and federal courts in Rhode Island, Connecticut, Massachusetts, Maine, New Hampshire, New York, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Virginia, Florida, Georgia, Alabama, Louisiana, and Texas, and appeals to the United States Courts of Appeals for the First, Second, and Fourth Circuits, the Rhode Island Supreme Court and the Appellate and Supreme Courts of Connecticut, as well as numerous arbitration and mediation proceedings. Dan has substantial trial and arbitration experience, having tried more than 30 matters to verdict, final judgment, or final arbitration decision.

    Insurance Coverage Litigation

    Dan’s work representing insurance companies in complex property insurance coverage litigation includes serving as counsel for insurers in significant cases arising from the COVID-19 pandemic, Superstorm Sandy, Hurricane Irene, Hurricane Ike, Hurricane Katrina, and the September 11 terrorist attacks. He has also litigated cases involving losses to residences and businesses arising from catastrophic fires and explosions, mold contamination, defective workmanship, and construction defects. He has significant experience in matters involving complex business interruption claims and associated accounting issues. In addition, he has litigated substantial cases arising under liability, marine, boiler and machinery, and builders’ risk policies.

    Dan's experience includes coordinating a major insurer’s investigation, coverage analysis and litigation regarding claims for damages associated with Chinese-made drywall; representation of a commercial property insurer in a case involving a $100 million claim by a publicly traded company for claimed losses arising from an arson fire; and representation of an insurance carrier in coverage litigation initiated by a major Roman Catholic archdiocese seeking coverage for a multimillion-dollar settlement with alleged victims of clergy sexual abuse.

    Business Litigation

    Dan has also represented other businesses in a broad spectrum of commercial litigation. He was lead litigation and trial counsel for an international pharmaceutical company in its initial response to, investigation of, and litigation arising from an explosion that resulted in serious personal injuries and significant property damage. Dan has represented financial institutions in challenges to the validity of mortgages and the Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems (MERS). Most recently, he assisted in the successful defense of national actuarial firms in malpractice cases involving claims asserted by a municipal pension system and by participants of a hospital system pension plan. His other case experience includes the trial and appeal of dissolution and shareholder derivative actions which established the scope of the business judgment rule in the state of Connecticut and a murder case that was a case study on the issue of time of death in Dr. Henry Lee's book Cracking Cases: The Science of Solving Crime.

    Dan has been listed in The Best Lawyers in America© in the area of Insurance Law since 2006 and selected to the Connecticut Super Lawyers list from 2007 to 2020. For ten years, he was a member of the adjunct faculty at the University of Connecticut School of Law, where he developed and taught a graduate-level course in property insurance law. He frequently speaks on insurance and litigation-related issues to bar and industry organizations and provides in-house training sessions to insurance company personnel on coverage issues and trial tactics. Dan previously served as co-chair of the firm’s Litigation Section and chair of the firm’s Insurance +  Reinsurance Practice Group and was a founding member and the original partner-in-charge of the firm's Providence office.

  • Experience
    • Experience

      Experience

        Significant Decisions

      • Josephson, LLC v. Affiliated FM Ins. Co., 2022 WL 999134 (R.I. Super. 2022) – rulings on cross motions for partial summary judgment in COVID-19 business interruption litigation holding, as a matter of first impression under Rhode Island law, that COVID-19 is not capable of causing physical loss or damage to property and that the policy’s Contamination Exclusion unambiguously applies to bar the claims.

      • ITT Inc. v. Factory Mutual Ins. Co., 2022 WL 1471245 (D. Conn. 2022) – ruling on motion to dismiss COVID-19 business interruption litigation holding under Connecticut law that none of the policyholder’s attempts to classify the impact of COVID-19 as physical loss or damage succeeds and therefore concluding that claims for coverage under Time Element, Civil or Military Authority, Ingress/Egress or Logistics Extra Cost fail.

      • Procaccianti Companies, Inc. v. Zurich American Ins. Co., 2022 WL 2802357 (D.R.I. 2022) – ruling granting motion to bifurcate and stay discovery on bad faith dismiss in COVID-19 business interruption litigation pending resolution of breach of contract and declaratory judgment claims relating to insurance coverage.

      • Boisse v. Miller, 267 A.3d 634 (R.I. 2022) – affirming trial court judgment following bench trial (2013 WL 4235342 (R.I. Super. 2013)) in which court found for insurer defendant in direct action statute action and cross-claims that insurer had no liability under CGL policy because 1) claims involved pure economic injury, and thus claimants had not demonstrated they sustained property damage; 2) there was no occurrence because contractor’s work, while negligent, was not accidental; and 3) claimed loss resulted from the contractor’s negligent workmanship and was thus excluded by the express terms of the policy.

      • Alfa Bank v. Doe, 2021 WL 5916794 (R.I. Super. 2021) – sustaining objections and denying motion to compel compliance with subpoena served upon non-party Rhode Island company and issued by Florida court at the request of Russian banking operation on grounds that subpoena was overly broad, excessive, unduly burdensome, impermissibly invades the province of a grand jury proceeding and impermissibly seeks company’s confidential, proprietary business information upon which it relies to remain competitive in cybersecurity market.

      • Travelers Indemnity Company of America v. Deauville Hotel Property, LLC, 533 F.Supp.3d 1287 (S.D. Fla. 2021) – rulings on cross-motions for summary judgment holding that boiler and machinery policy distinguished between time spent to repair damage and losses associated enforcement of laws and ordinances that regulate property construction and thus unambiguously excludes from “period of restoration” time required to obtain permits and approvals and upholding insurer’s interpretation and calculations of coinsurance provision.

      • City of Providence v. Buck Consultants, 2015 WL 7083732 (D.R.I. 2015) – District court granted summary judgment in favor of pension actuary where City alleged the actuary erroneously overestimated the savings associated with negotiated pension reforms, including suspension of cost of living adjustments, with police officers, firefighter and retirees, on grounds that City’s damages were too speculative. 

      • Lombardi v. Universal North America Insurance Company, 2015 WL 600823 (Conn. Super. 2015) - In a case of first impression under Connecticut law, the Superior Court held anti-concurrent cause provision in property insurance policy was unambiguous and enforceable and applied to defeat claim for destruction of shoreline home resulting from Tropical Storm Irene.

      • Ardente v. Standard Fire Insurance Company, 744 F.3d 815 (1st Cir. 2014) - Obtained reversal by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit of a district court judgment finding that manufacturing defect exclusion in yacht insurance policy was ambiguous. The First Circuit panel, which included retired Supreme Court Justice David H. Souter, agreed with our client's position that the latent defect exception to the manufacturing defect exclusion was not ambiguous and the damage to the yacht did not fall within that exception, and directed the district court to enter judgment in favor of our client.

      • City of Providence v. Buck Consultants, 2013 WL 4047133 (D.R.I. 2013) – District court granted motion to dismiss City’s false claims act count, concluding that the actuarial services were not “worthless” and the element of scienter had not been adequately pled. 

      • Emsbo v. Fireman’s Fund Insurance Company, 950 F.Supp.2d 369 (D.R.I. 2013) – District court granted motion for summary judgment holding that damage to residence caused by torrential rainstorm fell within the scope of the water damage exclusion of homeowner’s policy.

      • Travco Insurance Company v. Ward,  504 Fed. Appx. 251 (4th Cir. 2013) and 284 Va. 547 (Va. 2012) – upon certification from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, the Virginia Supreme Court affirmed the rulings of the United States District Court (715 F.Supp.2d 699 (E.D. Va. 2010)) on summary judgment motion ruling in favor of insurer in declaratory judgment action that there was no coverage under property insurance policy for claimed losses caused by the presence of Chinese manufactured drywall.

      • Chapman v. Standard Fire Insurance Company, 2012 WL 3644778 (D. Me. 2012) – In case of first impression under Maine law, district court concluded that statutory unfair claims practices counts were time barred based on suit limitation provision in homeowner’s policy.

      • Colony Bank v. Hanover Insurance Company, 2011 WL 5419459 (M.D. Ga. 2011) – District court granted summary judgment on breach of contract claim for failure to pay $4.7 million dollar claim for fire damage to historic textile mill because court concluded that policy did not automatically renew under Georgia statutes. The district court also granted summary judgment of the bad faith claim, concluding that Hanover had reasonable grounds to contest the claim and no reasonable factfinder could conclude otherwise. The district court did allow the bank’s claim for breach of contract for failure to notify the bank of the non-renewal of the policy to survive.

      • Indian Harbor Insurance Company v. Assurance Company of America, 2010 WL 2346654 (D.R.I. 2010) – District court granted builders risk insurer’s motion for summary judgment on grounds that project owner’s procurement of permanent property policy terminated the coverage under the builder’s risk policy.

      • Imperial Trading Co. v. Travelers Property Casualty Company of America, 654 F.Supp.2d 518 (E.D. La. 2009) – District court granted motion in limine to exclude the testimony of policyholder’s bad faith expert.

      • Pfizer, Inc. v. Mine Safety Appliances Company, 45 Conn. L. Rptr. (Conn. Super. 2008) – Denial of manufacturer defendant’s motion for summary judgment in cases arising from explosion at facility in Groton, Connecticut on grounds that there existed genuine issues of fact as to product liability and recklessness counts of case against manufacturer based on its claimed failure to account for and disclose relevant safety and storage information of risks involved in the transport and storage of chemical reagent at ambient temperatures. 

      • Figueroa v. Allstate Insurance Company, 105 Conn. App. 538, 938 A.2d 1264 (2008), cert denied, 286 Conn. 912, 944 A.2d 982 (2008) – Affirming Superior Court’s granting summary judgment in favor of insurer in $4.35 million direct action statute claim holding there was no coverage in effect when plaintiff was injured.  

      • Other Representative Matters

      • Representing multiple insurers in litigation seeking coverage under business interruption and other time element coverages in property policies for economic losses associated with the COVID-19 pandemic. 

      • Represented insurer in connection with its investigation of a fire loss at a former manufacturing plant in Rhode Island where the authorities discovered an illegal butane hash oil manufacturing operation and violation of the policy’s protective safeguards endorsement.  

      • Represented builder’s risk insurer in its investigation and adjustment of a claim arising from the collapse of the steel structure of an indoor football practice facility being built on a university campus and claimed faulty workmanship of a subcontractor in its erection of the steel.

      • Represented affiliate of a national insurance company in its response to claims for losses associated with the effects of Chinese-made drywall, including development of investigative protocols and coverage analysis and representation in a declaratory judgment action seeking a declaration that there is no coverage under property insurance policies for the cost of replacing and remediating the effects of the drywall. After oral argument before the federal district court for the Eastern District of Virginia, summary judgment was entered in favor of our client in the first federal court decision in the country deciding coverage issues for Chinese drywall under homeowners policies. On appeal, the coverage issues were certified to the Virginia Supreme Court, which ruled unanimously in favor of our client's position.

      • Represented an insurance carrier in the defense of an adversary proceeding brought by Chapter 7 trustee and creditor banks of a publicly traded corporation involving a claim for over $100 million of inventory allegedly damaged in a warehouse fire.  Representation included coordination of fire investigation (determined to be arson), investigation of company’s books and records to help discover and quantify fraud in the insured’s business practices and in presentment of the inventory loss, and representation of carrier in criminal proceedings  involving company’s directors and officers.

      • Represented insurer in claim brought by Alabama based seller of Christian-based inspirational gift items, such as T-shirts and Bible covers, to recover business interruption losses and expenses in excess of $10 million and bad faith damages following a fire that damaged the insured's warehouse and inventory. 

      • Represented commercial property insurers in coverage actions involving claims arising from Hurricanes Katrina and Rita.

      • Represented commercial property insurers in several multimillion-dollar cases and claims involving business interruption losses in lower Manhattan arising from September 11 terrorist attack on the World Trade Center.

      • Represented insurance carrier in coverage litigation initiated by major Roman Catholic archdiocese seeking coverage for multimillion-dollar settlement with alleged victims of clergy sexual abuse.

      • Represented property insurer in connection with a claim in excess of $20 million resulting from a catastrophic fire loss at a regional composting facility in Hartford, Connecticut.

      • Represented property insurers regarding coverage and claim analysis for property insurance claims for damage relating to presence of mold in a public school building.

      • Representing multiple insurers in litigation seeking coverage under business interruption and other time element coverages in property insurance policies for economic losses associated with COVID-19 pandemic.

      • back to top
    • Professional Associations

      Professional Associations

      University of Connecticut School of Law
      Insurance Law Center, Adjunct Faculty (1998 - 2008)

      American Bar Association
      Section of Litigation
      Tort Trial and Insurance Practice Section, Past Vice Chair of Property Insurance Law Committee

      Connecticut Bar Association
      Insurance Law Section
      Litigation Section

      Rhode Island Bar Association
      Federal Court Bench and Bar Committee
      Superior Court Bench and Bar Committee

      Rhode Island Bar Foundation
      Fellow
    • Honors + Awards

      Honors + Awards

      Selected by his peers for inclusion in The Best Lawyers in America© in the area of Insurance Law since 2006.

      Selected to the Connecticut Super Lawyers list from 2007 to 2020.

  • NEWS + PRESS
    • Publications

      Publications

      Chapters entitled "Suit Limitations and Statutes of Limitations” and “Suit Limitations Checklist” in Property Insurance Litigator’s Handbook, Third Edition (2022), edited by Andrew B. Downs and Heidi Hudson Raschke (2022), published by the ABA.

      "Let’s Agree to Disagree – Undisputed Amounts and Partial Payments," co-authored with Laura Farach, published in the Winter 2018 edition of The Brief, a publication of the Tort Trial and Insurance Practice Section of the American Bar Association (3/2018)

      "Proof of Lender’s Standing Required by Insurers," published in Connecticut Law Tribune, co-authored with Allison Blais (2/8/2010)

      "Property Insurance Litigation in the Aftermath of Hurricane Katrina: The Early Results," published in CPCU Society Claims Quarterly, co-authored with Gregory P. Varga and Christopher F. Girard (11/2006)

      "Insurance Coverage Litigation in the Aftermath of Hurricane Katrina," published in CPCU Society Claims Quarterly, coauthor (12/2005)

      "Suspension of Operations," published in Connecticut Law Tribune (12/2/2002)

      "Recent Developments in Property Insurance Law," published in Tort and Insurance Law Journal, 35 Tort & Ins. L.J. 581, contributing author (2000)

      "Applying the Efficient Proximate Cause Doctrine in First-Party Coverage Disputes," published in CGL Reporter (1999)

      "The Standard Mortgage Clause in Property Insurance Policies," published in Tort and Insurance Law Journal, 33 Tort & Ins. L.J.81 (1997)

      "Explore Hartford: Twenty Terrific Tours," published by Leadership Greater Hartford (1996)

    • Presentations

      Presentations

      "COVID-19: At the Intersection of Property Insurance and Science," co-presented with Stephen E. Goldman and J. Tyler Butts, joined by experts in biophysics, toxicology and industrial hygiene for an interactive discussion of the science behind COVID-19. (4/6/2020)
      • » more info

      "Insurance Litigation: Leveraging Daubert/Frye Admissibility Standards for Expert Testimony in State and Federal Court," which discussed the Daubert/Frye standards for admissibility of expert witness testimony in insurance coverage, bad faith, and claims litigation. (3/5/2020)
      • » more info

      "A Defense Attorney's Perspective for the Fire Investigator," co-presented with Dana M. Horton, as part of the Connecticut Fire Academy’s 24th Annual Advanced Fire Investigation School program in Windsor Locks, Connecticut. (5/1/2019)
      • » more info

      "A Defense Attorney’s Perspective for the Fire Investigator," presented during the International Association of Arson Investigators (Connecticut Chapter) 33rd Annual Seminar in Rocky Hill, Connecticut (11/16/2018)
      • » more info

      "Insurance Bad Faith 'Setups'," CLE webcast, presented by the National Business Institute (NBI) (11/8/2018)
      • » more info

      "Business Interruption Claims Arising from Catastrophes," co-presented with Eugene P. Murphy and Wystan M. Ackerman, webinar (3/22/2018)
      • » more info

      "The Increasing Threat of Global Ransomware," co-presented with Eugene Choi, Zurich North America, at the 2018 Spring Meeting for the ABA Tort Trial and Insurance Practice Section’s Property Insurance Law Committee in Nashville, Tennessee. (3/2/2018)
      • » more info

      "Bad Faith Law and the Origin of the Set-Up," presented at National Business Institute Seminar “Insurance Bad Faith ‘Set-Up’ in Connecticut,” in Hartford, Connecticut. (12/12/2017)

      "Business Interruption Issues Arising from Hurricanes," co-presented with Stephen E. Goldman, Wystan M. Ackerman and Eugene P. Murphy, at in-house presentation to 60 in-house lawyers and claim adjusters in New York, New York. (11/14/2017)

      "Preparing and Providing Testimony in a Fire Case," co-presented with Eugene P. Murphy, at the Florida Advisory Committee on Arson Prevention 39th Annual Seminar in Ocala, Florida. (3/8/2017)

      "Cyber Security Risks and Challenges," co-presented with Jean Lehman, HSNO, at the PLRB Regional Adjuster’s Conference in St. Louis, Missouri (9/7 – 9/8/2016)

      "Developing & Recurring Issues In Property Insurance," co-presented with J. Tyler Butts and Raymond T. DeMeo, at in-house client presentation to 30 adjusters and claim managers (6/29/2016)

      "Critical Issues in Business Interruption Coverage / Daubert Challenges in Accounting," co-presented with Gregory P. Varga, at in-house client seminar in New York, New York (2/6/2015)

      "Business Interruption: Storms and Losses of Income: The Tough Issues," co-presented with Peter Kahn, Matson, Driscoll & D’Amico, Richard Lewis, Reed Smith, and Jim Errico at Windstorm Insurance Conference in Orlando, Florida. (1/28 – 29/2014)

      "Bank Claims," presented to New England Claims Adjusters (1/14/2014)

      "Foreclosure Issues with Property Claims," presented at the PLRB Regional Adjusters Conferences in Garden Grove, California (6/11 – 12/2013), Des Moines, Iowa (9/10 – 11/2013) and Concord, North Carolina (10/29 – 30/2013)

      "Catastrophe Response & File Management," co-presented with Michael Barrett, Engle Martin, at PLRB Regional Adjusters Conferences in Providence, Rhode Island (6/26 – 27/2012), Schaumberg, Illinois (9/5 – 6/2012) and Dallas, Texas (11/13 – 14/2012)

      "Preparing for and Providing Testimony," co-presented with Joseph Carey, at Rhode Island Chapter of the International Association of Arson Investigators Training Session. (3/21/2012)

      "Recent Developments in Discovery in Insurance Coverage Cases," at Connecticut Bar Association Insurance Law Section (5/18/2005)

      "Overview of Recent Bad Faith Cases Impacting Trials," at TIPS Property Insurance Law Committee program "Partnering With Counsel From Claim to Verdict: Bad Faith Trial of a Mold Claim" (4/12/2002)

      "Ordinance and Law Coverage," at New England Claims Executives Association, co-presented with Gerald P. Dwyer Jr. (3/12/2002)

      "The Economic Loss Doctrine," at program for mid-winter meeting of the Tort and Insurance Practice Section's Property Insurance Law Committee of the American Bar Association, "Subrogation – Investigation Through Litigation," Pebble Beach, California (4/15/2000)

      "Appraisal for the New Millennium," at half-day seminar for New England Claims Executives Association (4/13/1999)

      "Bad Faith Litigation in Connecticut," at National Business Institute (NBI) seminars (1/20 to 1/21/1999)

      "Collapse Coverage," at program at regional meeting of the TIPS' Property Insurance Law Committee of the ABA, "What Claims Professionals and Attorneys Should Know About Concurrent Causation, Ensuing Loss, and Collapse," New York, New York (12/14/1998)

      "What Is Efficient Proximate Cause," at ABA's Annual Meeting program of the TIPS, "Hot Button Topics in Property Insurance Coverage: Concurrent Causation, Ensuing Loss, and Collapse," Toronto, Ontario (8/1/1998)

      "Collapses Not Covered: Excluded Property and Settling, Cracking, Shrinkage, Bulging, or Expansion," at regional meeting of the TIPS' Property Insurance Law Committee of the ABA, "Collapse Coverage," Chicago, Illinois (6/11/1998)

      "Recent Developments in Civil and Criminal Fire Cases," at International Association of Arson Investigators, Connecticut Chapter (3/18/1998)
      • » more info

      "Meeting the Obligations of Good Faith and Fair Dealing," at Connecticut Interlocal Risk Management Agency (CIRMA) (3/6/1998)

      "Contractual Period of Limitations, Fraud, and Concealment," at regional meeting of the TIPS' Property Insurance Law Committee of the ABA, "The First-Party Property Policy: Policy Conditions & Policy Defenses," Chicago, Illinois (5/1997)

      "Insuring to Value," at Connecticut Insurance Day (4/1997)

      "Recent Developments in Civil and Criminal Arson Cases," at Connecticut chapter of International Association of Arson Investigators (IAAI) (6/1996)

      "Emerging Issues in Insurance Claims Litigation, 'Practical Aspects of Litigating of Concurrent Causation and Pollution Cases Under First-Party Policies'," at Lorman Education Services seminar (4/1995)

    • News

      R+C in the News

      • December 8, 2022

        Robinson+Cole Insurance Group Highlighted in Latest Issue of Connecticut Insurance Law Journal

        • » more info
        • View article
      • May 2, 2019

        Dan Sullivan and Dana Horton Present at Connecticut Fire Academy

        • » more info
      • November 30, 2018

        Dan Sullivan Shares "A Defense Attorney’s Perspective for the Fire Investigator"

        • » more info
      • November 20, 2018

        Dan Sullivan Presents CLE Webcast on Insurance Bad Faith "Setups"

        • » more info
      • November 5, 2018

        Providence Office Participates in 2018 Rhode Island Walk for Epilepsy

        • » more info
        • View article
      • October 18, 2018

        51 Robinson+Cole Lawyers Recognized by Super Lawyers®

        • » more info
        • View article
      • August 20, 2018

        52 Robinson+Cole Lawyers Listed in The Best Lawyers in America© 2019

        • » more info
        • View article
      • May 3, 2018

        Dan Sullivan Present at 2018 Advanced Fire Investigation School

        • » more info
      • April 13, 2018

        Wystan Ackerman, Gene Murphy, and Dan Sullivan Present Webinar on Business Interruption Claims Arising from Catastrophes

        • » more info
      • April 4, 2018

        Dan Sullivan Co-Authors Article Published in ABA Tort Trial & Insurance Practice Section Magazine

        • » more info
      • March 8, 2018

        Laura Farach, Dan Sullivan, and Greg Varga, Participate in ABA TTIPS Property Insurance Law Committee Spring CLE Conference

        • » more info
      • December 18, 2017

        Dan Sullivan and Greg Varga Co-present on Bad Faith Law in Connecticut

        • » more info
      • April 20, 2017

        Insurance Group Lawyers Present on Undisputed Amounts and Partial Payments

        • » more info
      • March 24, 2017

        Insurance + Reinsurance Group Lawyers Present at 39th Annual Arson Seminar

        • » more info
      • May 18, 2016

        Dan Sullivan Presents at Connecticut Fire Academy’s Training Session

        • » more info

      R+C News Releases

      • August 18, 2022

        74 Robinson+Cole Lawyers Listed in The Best Lawyers in America 2023

        • » more info
        • View article
      • August 19, 2021

        65 Robinson+Cole Lawyers Listed in The Best Lawyers in America© 2022

        • » more info
        • View article
      • October 15, 2020

        47 Robinson+Cole Lawyers Recognized in Super Lawyers®

        • » more info
        • View article
      • October 19, 2019

        52 Robinson+Cole Lawyers Recognized by Super Lawyers®

        • » more info
        • View article
      • August 15, 2019

        57 Robinson+Cole Lawyers Listed in The Best Lawyers in America© 2020

        • » more info
        • View article
      • October 17, 2017

        Robinson+Cole Lawyers Recognized by Super Lawyers®

        • » more info
        • View article
      • August 15, 2017

        Fifty-Nine Robinson+Cole Lawyers Listed in The Best Lawyers in America© 2018

        • » more info
        • View article
      • October 18, 2016

        Robinson+Cole Lawyers Recognized by Super Lawyers®

        • » more info
        • View article
      • August 15, 2016

        Robinson+Cole Receives Top Listing in Connecticut Lawyer Count in The Best Lawyers in America® 2017

        • » more info
        • View article
      • October 19, 2015

        Robinson+Cole Lawyers Recognized by Super Lawyers®

        • » more info
        • View article
      • August 18, 2015

        Robinson+Cole Receives Top Listing in Connecticut Lawyer Count in The Best Lawyers in America® 2016

        • » more info
        • View article
      • October 17, 2014

        Robinson+Cole Lawyers Recognized by Super Lawyers

        • » more info
        • View article
      • August 19, 2014

        Robinson+Cole Receives Top Listing in Connecticut Lawyer Count in Best Lawyers National Peer Review Survey

        • » more info
        • View article
      • August 16, 2013

        Robinson & Cole Receives Top Listing in Connecticut Attorney Count in Best Lawyers National Peer Review Survey

        • » more info
        • View article
      • October 22, 2012

        Super Lawyers® Names 49 Robinson & Cole Attorneys to 2012 List and Recognizes 26 as Rising Stars

        • » more info
        • View article
      • August 28, 2012

        Robinson & Cole Receives Top Listing in Connecticut Attorney Count in Best Lawyers National Peer Review Survey

        • » more info
        • View article
      • September 12, 2011

        Robinson & Cole Receives Top Listing in Connecticut Attorney Count in Best Lawyers National Peer Review Survey

        • » more info
        • View article