Environmental Litigation and Dispute Resolution

Overview

Members of Robinson+Cole’s Environmental Litigation and Dispute Resolution Team routinely represent clients involved in private litigation and government enforcement matters in New England and across the country. Our litigation experience includes actions under the full range of federal and state environmental laws, common law claims involving contaminated properties, and toxic tort matters involving exposure to substances such as hazardous chemicals, mold, lead-based paint, and asbestos. Many of our team members have degrees in scientific and engineering disciplines and/or prior employment with relevant government agencies or consulting firms. Our technical backgrounds, prior work experience, litigation skills, and deep knowledge of environmental law enable us to quickly identify issues and options and secure cost-effective and successful results for our clients.

Our Services

Our environmental litigation and enforcement capabilities include the following:

  • managing all aspects of environmental and toxic tort litigation, including trials and appeals
  • defending civil and criminal enforcement actions in administrative tribunals and in state and federal courts
  • responding rapidly to workplace exposures, spills and releases, search warrants, and other emergencies
  • advising on the scientific and technical aspects of environmental cases
  • providing a well-developed network of outside consultants and experts skilled in a host of complex environmental issues
  • conducting efficient and effective internal investigations
    • Experience
      • Environmental Litigation

      • Lead counsel for a drum recycling company in a CERCLA action at a dioxin-contaminated sediment site where past and projected costs exceeded $150 million. After over eight years of litigation with the major liable party, EPA, and several government military defendants involving more than 30 expert witnesses, we secured an ability to pay settlement shortly before trial.

      • Defended the purchaser of a nuclear power plant in an action seeking to prevent the transfer of environmental permits. Plaintiff's application for a temporary restraining order was denied shortly before the deal closed, and the suit was ultimately dismissed.

      • Defended a Fortune 500 company in a $250 million, 400-member class action in Colorado state court involving claims of groundwater contamination and vapor intrusion. Matter settled for less than 10 percent of original claim.

      • Represented transportation company in defense of an environmental class action trial in Massachusetts state court, one of the very few class action trials resulting from an environmental incident and, to our knowledge, the first environmental class action ever tried in Massachusetts. The case involved claims for property damage resulting from an oil spill in Buzzards Bay in 2003. The class was made up of approximately 1,000 residents from the Town of Mattapoisett who alleged their shoreline property was oiled as a result of the spill. The March 2010 trial, which lasted two weeks, addressed the claims of eight individual class members. The jury ultimately awarded a very favorable result for the client. The results of these initial cases were meant to provide the parties with a basis to resolve the remaining claims.

      • Represented nuclear fuel manufacturer in Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) cost recovery claim against the United States. The facility was contaminated with highly enriched uranium as a result of contract work performed for the U.S. Navy in connection with the development of the nuclear submarine program. Our client recovered a substantial portion of its multi-million dollar site remediation costs from the Government. The cleanup was conducted under the auspices of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

      • Recovered response costs and EPA oversights costs on behalf of manufacturing client in trial of CERCLA action against an uncooperative liable party.

      • Represented owner of commercial property in successfully obtaining an injunction and damages resulting from soil and groundwater contamination coming from company on neighboring property.

      • Represented former nuclear fuel manufacturer based in Illinois in multiparty CERCLA cost recovery action brought by current facility owner against former operators and arrangers, including the United States. Current owner conducted multimillion-dollar site remediation and site closure to address a legacy of radiological contamination.

      • Evaluated potential litigation against upgradient manufacturing facility in connection with complex sediment site in Bridgeport, Connecticut.

      • Defended lessee of bulk fuel oil terminal in dispute over the condition of the tanks and ancillary equipment following termination of the lease.

      • Defended gasoline distributor in defense of wrongful death claims arising from building explosion allegedly caused by free-phase gasoline on groundwater table.

      • Defended insurance carrier in coverage dispute for denial of landfill operating permits.

      • Counseled former owner of midwestern manufacturing facility in defense of state enforcement actions for site investigation and remediation and in negotiations with current facility owner.

      • Defended law firm in malpractice action alleging failure to advise client about environmental disclosure requirements of the property transfer law.

      • Defended a razor blade manufacturer against common law claims brought by the owner of the former National Oil Services site in West Haven, Connecticut.

      • Represented gasoline dealer and distributor in multidistrict litigation arising from alleged contamination of drinking water supplies with Methyl Tertiary Butyl Ether (MTBE).

      • Secured favorable jury verdict in nuisance case against confined animal feeding operation.

      • Represent minerals manufacturer and mining operation in connection with the remediation of legacy mercury and PCB contamination. The facility was originally owned and operated by the United States, and specialty metals mined there were used to support war-time operations during World War II and the Korean Conflict. In addition to providing support on completing environmental remedial obligations, Robinson & Cole is representing the company in its cost recovery claim against the Government.

      • Liaison Counsel

      • Selected (and approved by the court) as common counsel for a group of third-party generator defendants at a waste oil refinery site at which plaintiffs sought injunctive relief through an RCRA citizens suit, response costs under state and federal law, and diminution of property value under common law theories.

      • Served as liaison counsel to a group of 25 responsible parties in connection with a former barrel reclamation site, negotiating an Administrative Order on Consent with EPA for a PCB removal action, working with contractors to implement the removal action, and simultaneously addressing state requirements for site-wide investigation and remediation.

      • Co-common counsel at Midwestern Superfund site responsible for organizing the parties, negotiating cash-out agreements, and ensuring timely and cost-effective performance of a removal action at an abandoned waste oil facility.

      • Counseled a large, privately held manufacturing client, and served as liaison counsel for other liable parties, in a project involving a contaminated municipal water supply well, regional and on-site ground water investigation and remediation efforts, on-site soils investigation and remediation, a mediated allocation process, contribution litigation, a natural resource damages settlement, and defense of toxic tort claims.

      • Environmental Counseling and Dispute Resolution

      • Represented client in multiparty allocation of landfill cleanup costs, successfully advocating for use of contribution proceeds to serve as means to correct interim allocation inequities.

      • Represented client in landfill allocation and EPA consent decree negotiations, including negotiation of carve-out of activities to be performed by uncooperative liable parties.

      • Counseled a large, privately held manufacturing client in a project involving a contaminated municipal water supply well, and regional and onsite groundwater investigation and remediation, and on-site RCRA Corrective Action.

      • Assisted insurance carrier in damages evaluation for a catastrophic fire loss at a regional composting facility, working with composting, waste management, and engineering experts to determine operational value and replacement cost.

      • Served as environmental counsel to insurance carrier in a multimillion-dollar property insurance claim for anthrax contamination at a tabloid newspaper publisher's headquarters.

      • Other Experiences

      • Defended multimedia enforcement action brought by the Office of the Attorney General on behalf of the Connecticut DEP. Alleged violations involve process discharge water, noncontact cooling water, waste, air, and stormwater issues.

      • Represented manufacturing client in defense of enforcement action by state agency for alleged hazardous waste, property transfer, and water pollution control act violations. Negotiated a comprehensive settlement and assisted in preparation of site characterization work plans and Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) closure plan.

      • Represented ship operator in defense of Clean Water Act violation.

      • Representation of a diversified aerospace company in response to OSHA citations. One citation was dismissed completely. The other was settled by withdrawal of "willful" citation. Penalty reduced to $16,500. Appeal handled out of New York Regional Solicitor's Office.

      • back to top
    • News
      • August 18, 2022

        74 Robinson+Cole Lawyers Listed in The Best Lawyers in America 2023

        • » more info
        • View article
      • November 6, 2020

        Robinson+Cole Receives 36 First-Tier Metropolitan Rankings and Four National Rankings in Latest U.S. News – Best Lawyers “Best Law Firms”

        • » more info
        • View article
      • August 20, 2020

        61 Robinson+Cole Lawyers Listed in The Best Lawyers in America© 2021

        • » more info
        • View article
      • November 1, 2018

        Robinson+Cole Receives 36 First-Tier Metropolitan Rankings and Four National Rankings in Latest U.S. News – “Best Law Firms” Survey

        • » more info
        • View article
      • May 18, 2018

        Jim Ray and Emilee Mooney Scott Offer Insights on PFAS

        • » more info
      • February 14, 2017

        Megan Baroni Co-Chairs CLE Joint Seminar for ABA's Section of Litigation

        • » more info
      • July 28, 2016

        Former Partner Returns to Robinson+Cole’s Environmental and Energy Practice

        • » more info
        • View article
      • July 5, 2016

        Megan Baroni and Tavo True-Alcala’s Article on the Clean Water Rule Featured in the ABA Environmental Litigation Committee Newsletter

        • » more info
      • November 23, 2015

        Jim Ray and Megan Baroni Co-author Article for Environmental Litigation

        • » more info
      • July 28, 2015

        Brian Freeman and Megan Baroni Co-author Article for Environmental Litigation

        • » more info
      • February 26, 2015

        Environmental Lawyers Publish Article on Lessons from Deepwater Horizon

        • » more info
      • February 12, 2014

        Stamford Lawyer Co-chairs CLE Seminar for ABA's Section of Litigation

        • » more info
      • December 12, 2013

        Stamford Lawyer Authors Article for ABA's Environmental Litigation

        • » more info
      • February 8, 2013

        Megan Baroni Authors Article Published on ABA Website

        • » more info
      • December 28, 2012

        Peter Knight Authors Chapter on Environmental Class Actions

        • » more info
      • February 1, 2012

        Environmental Partner Chairs ABA Panel on Environmental Class Actions

        • » more info
    • Publications + Presentations
    • "Virtual Depositions, Hearings, and Trials: Tips for the New Normal," presented by James P. Ray, as moderator of the breakout session during the American Bar Association's Litigation Section 2021 Virtual Annual Conference (5/6/2021)
      • » more info

      "What Are the Health, Environmental, and Litigation Challenges of PFAS?" presented by James P. Ray, presented at a Connecticut Business & Industry Association conference on PFAS. (6/13/2019)
      • » more info

      "How Are the Technical, Regulatory, and Legal Challenges of PFAS Being Addressed?" presented by Emilee Mooney Scott, presented at a Connecticut Business & Industry Association event. (6/13/2019)
      • » more info

      "Court Grants Summary Judgment in Favor of Two CERCLA Contribution Defendants," authored by James P. Ray, published as an ABA Section of Litigation, Environmental & Energy Litigation Committee “Practice Point” (3/30/2020)
      • » more info

      "Updates on Persistent Chemicals: PCBs, Perchlorate, and PFAS," presented by James P. Ray, at the DRI seminar Toxic Torts and Environmental Law 2020 - The Future Is Now (2/21/2020)
      • » more info

      "Connecticut Business & Industry Association’s (CBIA) 2019 Energy & Environment Conference," in Cromwell, CT (6/13/2019)
      • » more info

      "PFAS: It’s Not Just a Groundwater Issue," presented by James P. Ray, a webinar for public- and private-sector environmental professionals on litigation (5/22/2019)

      "Emhart v. United States: Another Failed Attempt to Prove Divisibility under CERCLA," published in Environmental Litigation, co-authored by Megan E. Baroni and James P. Ray (Fall 2015)
      • » more info

      "Mass Tort Claims Administration and Handling: Lessons from Deepwater Horizon," published in Environmental Litigation, co-authored by Alexander W. Judd and Peter R. Knight, a publication of the ABA (Winter 2015)
      • » more info

      "Certifying Environmental Class Actions After Walmart v. Dukes," authored by Peter R. Knight, published in Litigating Environmental Class Actions: Leading Lawyers on Successfully Guiding Clients Through Multi-Party Environmental Cases (11/29/2012)

      "Ruling Paves Way for Clean Water Act Litigation," published in Connecticut Law Tribune, co-authored by Robert S. Melvin and Emilee Mooney Scott (4/9/2012)

Our Team

Chair

Members